-
Posted by Lani Estepa on Thursday, November 23rd, 2006 at 8:01 pm

I would probably call it the Chinese invasion of the local market were it not for the seeming friendliness of this invasion to consumers. People are lining up at the cash registers with baskets filled with non-durable consumer items that include kitchenware, school supplies, home decors, electrical supplies, hand tools, RTWs, shoes, toiletries, junk food and what have you. That the quality of the products is not that good is beside the point. What matters to consumers is that their cash can buy more at these stores (there are 3 in Vigan) selling made-in-China (some I think are made in Korea) products. Don’t bother reading the labels, unless you know Mandarin or perhaps Cantonese. And, caveat emptor, what you see on the label is not exactly what you get. Visiting the stores is like deja vu, reminding me of stores in China and Hong Kong train stations, and those factory outlets where tour guides bring tourists so their travel agencies can get commissions from the sales.


While producers and retailers of local goods (most of which relatively cost more than these made-in-China goods) may complain of the competition, hey, it’s laissez faire – freedom of enterprise. Blame the World Trade Organization if you like, but there’s no opting out of economic integration of domestic markets. But do we really have to import hand towels, plastic hangers and even toothpicks from China? Couldn’t we produce them right here in the Philippines? Yes, but the Chinese produce them more cheaply than we could, thus they can sell them at low, low prices in our local markets, so we might as well buy from them. And then again, because of trade liberalization, even locally made aprons face stiff competition from Chinese-made ones.
It’s not only the Philippines that’s being flooded with products made in the “factory of the world.” It is likely that the pair of Nike shoes you received from a relative in the US is made by a Nike subcontractor in China. Having co-existed with the Filipino-Chinese for centuries, we Filipinos know that the business acumen and enterprising spirit of the Chinese race are embedded in their culture. What amazes me is how capitalism thrives under the socialist regime in China.
Meanwhile, Chinese goods continue to flood our markets; one need only to go to Divisoria to discover the many tiangge selling RTWs, bags, fashion accessories at such cheap prices that even Imelda Marcos goes there to buy. On the flipside, the Philippines gets to sell to China, too. In fact we are selling much more to the Chinese than we are buying from them, according to the Philippine embassy in Beijing. We export, among other things, electronics, automotive parts and fresh fruits to the Chinese market. So we can’t really complain about Chinese goods invading local markets when we are enjoying a much larger market in mainland China, all 1.3 billion of them.

Who is David Ricardo?
1 | Joy November 27th, 2006 at 10:07 pmMaybe the Department of Education and the Commission on Higher Education should consider including Mandarin and Cantonese languages in the Philippine curriculum?
2 | Joy November 27th, 2006 at 10:15 pmRe: David Ricardo – He is the economist who introduced the theory of comparative advantage. He believed that a country is better off buying products which other countries can produce more cheaply than it can, and instead concentrate its resources on producing and exporting those goods that it can produce relatively more cheaply than other countries. This has become the basis of international trade today. Re: Mandarin and Cantonese. That would be a good idea. There are 3.1 billion Chinese, a very large market. If Filipino business people want to tap this market, they would need to speak some form of Chinese.
3 | Lani November 28th, 2006 at 10:49 amI received an email from Engr. Alfonso Quilala about the exact Chinese population. The Chinese population stood at 1.3 billion in January 2005 (not 3.1 as I originally wrote), and is predicted to increase by 10 million a year. Thanks for the correction, Manong.
4 | Lani December 5th, 2006 at 9:36 am